The sexual unconditioned reflex: A
moral and ethical responsibility to educate the masses?
First, before I educate you on how to
create a specific sexuality in a pubescent youth, e.g.
heterosexuality or homosexuality, I would like to briefly examine the
moral and
ethical considerations. It came to my
mind that leaving the masses uneducated or even under-educated would
have it's definite benefit overall in society as to leave the general
assumption that sexuality is a random
happening and that there are no dire consequences to the effect of
overall societal integrity, especially in so much as "nature"
being the
only possible factor preceding the
outcome. This is increasingly a powerful motivator when taken into
consideration the overall effect that this knowledge might create an
ability in those less desirable
"capitalists" who might take advantage of this information
and use it to their own ill will. However, in the face of the massive
amounts of
disinformation being produced by our
government and others, not to mention the overwhelming amount of
discrediting, character assassination and other world media attacks
against credible information, I have
come to my final conclusion, and thus, the argument in the case of
morality wins. This is not to suppose that all information the media
attacks is credible, quite the
opposite, and so I hope you understand the true complexity and depth
to which these unscrupulous individuals, especially together as a
socialist collective are willing to go
in order to subvert the truth.
Of course I plan to carry this
knowledge further into the field of the unconditioned defense reflex,
the creation of terrorism utilizing the objective ( neurophysiology )
combined with the subjective (
psychology, and so, the operant portion of conditioning ), and the
wider implications of intelligence agencies being at the root cause
of most
if not all terrorism, and the reasons
and methodologies of these operations. For now, however, I will start
you out with something that is easily digestible, that is why I
have chosen this most basic example.
If at any time you are unable to
believe the truth I am about to put before you, feel free to study
neurophysiology for yourself. Please start with the father of modern
neurophysiology, Ivan Pavlov. Most will
try to character assassinate this man, usually by saying his research
was only on dogs, however there is a verifiable list of evidence
to the contrary, and so I leave you one
from the O.S.S.[1]
On to the creation of a conditioned
stimulus of the unconditioned sexual reflex. I hope this example
provides you with a more full understanding of your sexuality and how
it
came to be developed into what it is
today.
This example will be brief. This
example will be of the females unconditioned sexual reflex, though a
man's can be connected to a conditioned stimulus or to many
conditioned
stimulus as well, and differential
inhibition may be applied to either in order to achieve desired
results. Though this is for another paper, or more accurately, for
your own
study. I will add that the human
organism is a dual organism, so that understanding might be
accomplished of the usage of one or the others' ( male or female )
conditioned
stimulus might be used as a conditioned
stimulus for the other, or to even create a balance or a control of
the other using sexuality.
Remember that the stimulus that is to
be conditioned must precede in time the stimulation of the
unconditioned reflex.[2]
Example: A picture of a naked female is
given to a young pubescent female. The female is instructed to look
at the picture and while still looking at the picture she is
instructed to play with her vagina,
looking at the picture the entire time. This must be done in
repetition over and over again. The amount of repetitions is unknown
exactly,
because each biological organism
develops a conditioned reaction to stimulus at different rates of
exposure. After so many repetitions, the young pubescent female,
instructed
to look at the picture of the naked
female becomes now seemingly "naturally" sexually excited
and the vaginal fluids produce without her ever having to touch
herself. The
female is now sexually attracted to
other naked females. This conditioned stimulation is permanent. It
will depend upon the female, as I said before, biological systems
vary,
but after a certain period of time, the
conditioned stimulus will return to it's original strength and
actuation of the sexual unconditioned reflex.
Obviously if you did not want the young
pubescent female to know that you were creating a conditioned
stimulus of her sexual unconditioned reflex, operant conditioning
could
be employed in order to cause her to
"want" to look at the picture while masturbating. Operant
conditioning could then be further employed in order to cause her to
react in a
positive manner to the new conditioned
stimulus and thus lead her into the next conditioned stimulus in the
pattern of stimulations.
It is that simple, yet our governments
do not want our youth to understand this knowledge and will even
trick them into "discussions" about how being gay or
lesbian is not
their own choice! Even yet, they will
advance the children that are gay or lesbian, which means that they
have an agenda and a usage for these individuals!
[1]From Edward Hunter's "Brainwashing;
the story of men who defied it" ..."The scene shifted
again, and the light flashed without any biscuits falling from the
cone. The boy's
saliva flowed just the same. He was
reacting exactly as the dog."
[2]From Ivan Pavlov's "CONDITIONED
REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE
CEREBRAL CORTEX" ... Hence a first and most essential requisite
for the formation of a new conditioned reflex lies in a coincidence
in time of the action of any previously neutral stimulus with some
definite unconditioned stimulus. Further, it is
not enough that there should be
overlapping between the two stimuli; it is also and equally necessary
that the conditioned stimulus should begin to operate before the
unconditioned stimulus comes into
action.
No comments:
Post a Comment